Monday, 25 August 2014

How to teach English? Understanding your students needs:


This is the question which we ask ourselves every day. As a Second Language teacher it is our duty to know what are the best way of teaching English to the students .As we know there are various  theories and researches done on Second olanguage acquisition. How the individual acquire an additional  language is being debated from a long time .What are the barriers which student face while learning an additional tongue were the main focus of the researchers.

Teachers should know what are the problems  faced by students to acquire an additional tongue .While teaching students English as a first or second language we should keep in our mind different language acquisition theories and most importantly Krashen theory .

Krashen's  Affective filter hypothesis is a key to teaching .In simple words he said in his hypothesis that students are anxious , non motivated etc they will not learn language . In order to teach English it is necessary to provide a relax environment to the students where they can feel themselves more motivated. Students can learn language only when the teacher is able to lower their barriers.

Another important point is the input given to the students .teachers should make sure the input they give to the student is i+1 or only one step beyond their current level of competence. Teachers also focus too much on the accuracy of the language and they completely ignore to  develop fluency in their students .Students should be allowed to make mistakes and communicative function of language should be given more importance than the usage of correct grammatical forms .



Wednesday, 13 August 2014

Errors in Learning : Causes ,Types ,Sources and Theories


                                                                             

        Attitudes and Principles


Generally there are two different approaches to errors:

     1.  It is consider as sign of failure on student or teacher’s part
     2.  It is considered as essential part of learning                                                

We already have discussed Mistakes And Correction in detail .
In countries where English is taught as second language, students fear to make mistakes and being laughed at.  Defensive learning Learner relegates actual message and focuses on the correct form of his utterance.

    Errors because of faulty Language Teaching Methodology:

           
If second  language  learning is similar to first language learning, then why is it much more difficult? May be because of the teaching methodologies which are generally used in educational institutions

What should be the aim of the teachers regarding errors:

  Most teachers aim at perfection, but language is not a set of facts that can be perfectly learnt without making mistakes unlike geography, physics, etc.
Fluency is as important as knowing the correct forms and teachers should help students get fluent in whatever limited amount of knowledge they have instead of imposing burden of new words overnight

Correcting Errors:   

Correcting mistakes later and not interrupting the flow of an activity is recommended in language teaching so that the students don’t become over-aware of their mistakes

What Language to teach:    

Teachers desire to teach the best Lang (e.g. telling students not to use contraction—cant, won’t, etc). This shouldn’t be done because native speakers do use them and the student will get confused. Instead, teacher’s aim should be to teach the words and their different uses in different contexts. Inappropriate forms are as wrong as unacceptable ones (no one variety of Language is best—it is wrong to teach that formal Language is the best since “good morning” and “hi” cannot normally be substituted for each other in their respective contexts)

         Types of Errors:


SLIP: Carelessness in fluency
Error (systematic deviation);
Mistake (inconsistent deviation);
Lapse (“cheiving to astrive” instead of “striving to achieve

          Second language learners Vs Native language speakers


Secondly, learners make more mistakes because of their native language interfering with the target language. While learning a new language, children make guesses. Similarly, students of a language make “informed guesses,” so these guesses should be appreciated  for the development of their language skills

        Sources of Errors:


1.        Redundant Error:  

These kinds of errors occur due to  personal reasons (worrying about personal problems, fatigue, etc)

2.       Inherent Errors: 

 Inherent errors are those that are made due to faulty material e.g. wrong examples or teaching methodology.

3.      Individualisation:

 Each student has a different approach towards both learning and correcting errors (some do it item by item while others do it faster).  
                           

    Lexical Error:

                                                               
            Teachers should introduce the right vocabulary on the right time and should avoid lexical errors.

     Accent:


  Teachers should teach students the correct pronunciation

      What are the causes of Errors

   


 Carelessness:

 Carelessness is one of the major cause of errors . It is not always the student’s fault .Peer checking should be encouraged in order to minimise carelessness. You can see what is peer checking in my previous post Mistakes and Correction.

1st Lang interference


The basic problem for a second language learner is first language interference. Language is not habit formation as we already discuss in Second Language Acquisition Theories but  it is in modification of the rules as the student learns more about the language. Learners might make continuous errors if they are not taught the correct rules (only imitation doesn’t work). Old habits should be drilled out and new ones must be learnt . The difference between a child learning his mother-tongue and a language learner is that the learner is being prepared for exams and the learner set certain barriers to language acquisition. Teachers should teach an item in as many ways as possible 

Second Language Acquisition Theories


 IMPORTANT THEORIES IN THE FIELD OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Many theories have been developed to explain SLA. Every theory of SLA covers some aspect of language acquisition process. There are large numbers of SLA theories and some of the important are discussed. These are the theories which have caused the greatest impact in SLA field.
You may also like reading Mistakes and Correction and detail note on Errors in Learning

 THE UNIVERSALIST PERSPECTIVE IN SLA

The Universalist theory defines linguistics as a universal element. Universal grammar hypothesis is in contrast to the environmental perspective of Chomsky (1976), who considers language as a mirror of the mind. According to Chomsky theory, there is a language acquisition device because of which every human being is biologically endowed with a language learning faculty. This language acquisition device is important for the initial state of language development. According to the Universal grammar theory the input from the environment is insufficient for language acquisition
The Universal Grammar approach is not concerned with environmental perspective of language and is only concerned with learner’s mind that contains a language.
Universal grammar can be explained through two perspectives, the data driven perspective and the theory-driven perspective:
 The data driven perspective only study surface features of variety of languages. It examines how languages vary and which principles cause this differentiation. This approach looks at external factors or input as fundamental constituent. The data driven approach have several characteristics. For example there are several patterns which are present among languages and these patterns vary among languages. It focuses on universal aspect of language or what is common among languages i.e. subject, object or verb. And it focuses on implications of universals aspect of language for example property that is common among languages is that they all have vowels.
The theory-driven perspective studies in depth the properties of language. It analyses highly abstract principles of grammar. Internal factors which are part of cognitive and linguistic process is its main focus. The theory-driven approach includes the characteristic that language is acquired through innateness. This approach see language as a part of brain .According to this approach there are specific conditions and set of principles where knowledge of language develops.

 BEHAVIOURIST PERSPECTIVE IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Behaviourism is significant in educational psychology it takes language learning process as conditioning process and as habit formation. Behaviourist theory emphasises stimulus, response, and reinforcement as the important element of language learning.
In these theories behaviour is seen as reaction to internal or external stimuli in any particular environment. The environment is the source to provide a stimulus and this stimuli cause response in learners. The role of environment is very important in the exercise of learner’s abilities because it provides stimuli that give shape to person’s responses and it selectively reward some responses and not others. The language learning includes a set of stimulus-response-reward chains. Behaviourism looks language as a set of structures and acquisition as a system of habit formation and ignores internal mechanisms. Learning is automatically acquired through stimulus and response in the form of mechanical repetition.
Audio-lingual method is the   one of the behaviourist language teaching method which was popular in 1960’s. It was developed after World War 2 in the United States. In this method students memorise certain dialogues because according to this method language learning is process of habit formation.
They are supposed to learn the second language through imitation, repetition and reinforcement of certain structures. Errors are considered as formation of bad habit and they are needed to be corrected simultaneously.

                                             NATIVIST PERSPECTIVE IN SLA

Nativist theory of second language acquisition states that language is innate to humans from their birth. It is quite opposite to behaviourist theory, as they are of the view that the child learns language from imitation and practise.
According to this theory humans are born with a built-in-device that makes them able   to acquire language. This theory is advocated by Chomsky (1956) which claimed existence of inborn properties of language in children which predisposes them to acquire language.  This theory tends to explain mystery of native language acquisition is a very short time. Chomsky describes that this innate knowledge is present in “little black box” known as Language Acquisition Device (LAD). This acquisition is a systematic perception of language which helps to construct an internalised system of language.
McNeill (1966) further worked on this theory and described Language Acquisition Device consisting of some innate linguistic properties ; LAD has ability to differentiate speech sounds from other sounds which are present in the environment ; it has ability to group linguistic items into various classes that can be polished later,  it has  knowledge  that only a definite  kind of linguistic system is viable  and that other kinds are not; and it has the ability to involve in constant assessment of the developing linguistic system in order to build the simplest  system out of the linguistic data that are experienced.

 ACCULTURATION PERCEPTIVE IN SLA

Acculturation is an environmental-oriented theory   presented by Schumman (1978). In his investigation of some syntactic aspects with six learners he used questionnaires, observed their conversation for ten months and used a quantitative treatment to his experiment. According to him the people who are more socially and psychological distant from the target language group can acquire less amount of English.
In his opinion the social and psychological unification of the learner with the target language  group is necessary for SLA .According The acculturation theory the  learners will be unsuccessful in SLA if there are more social and psychological distances between them and the speakers of the second language.

SOCIAL INTERACTIONAISTS THEORY IN SLA

Social interactionists theorise that language emerged because of its social role in human interaction. The environment and social interactions are the key elements in language development. Input is important in social interactions as it provides a model for negotiation.
Hatch did not accept Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and were of the view that input alone is insufficient to explain SLA. Hatch does not agree that that learner first learn structures and then use them in their discourse. She believes the reverse possibility.
According to her one learns how to do conversation and interact verbally and then because of Hatch (1978) and Long (1981, 1996), this verbal conversation syntactic structures are developed
Long (1981) worked on interactionists theory and based upon his empirical study he observed that during conversation between  native speakers there are  less modifications in interaction than in the conversation between native and non-native speakers. He claims that modified input plays a positive role in SLA and these modifications in interactions signs the successful SLA.
Long (1996:451-2) suggests that negotiation for meaning, that stimulate interactional adjustments between the speakers cause proficient language acquisition  because it helps to  connect input , output, particularly selective attention and  internal learner capacities in productive ways.

According to Larsen-Freeman and Long both innate and environmental factors are involved in it and  that is the reason they consider interactionists views more influential than other theories .they are the first who view language as a matter of discourse.

 OUTPUT HYPOTHESIS IN SLA

Swain (1985, 1995) presents output hypothesis after the Krashen’s input hypothesis in which she claims when an individual practice any language, it helps them to observe their own production.
She says output helps the learners to monitor the gap between what they can say and what they want to say.  It helps them to know where gap lies in learning. Output helps in “noticing” in addition to it, it has two main functions: to stimulate reflection and to test hypothesis. She says that output helps to monitor what works and what does not.

 SOCIO-CULTURAL THEORY IN SLA

The socio-cultural theory views language or learning as a socially mediated process it was proposed by Vygotskian .According to him language is a cultural artifact that links social and psychological activities. Mediation is a basic principle in socio cultural theory.
According to his point of view development cannot be separated from its social context and language plays a central role in mental development. Lantolf and Thorne (2007) suggest that socio-cultural theory can also be applied on SLA.
They are of the view that man is a social being and he cannot be separated from the society he is living. Man learns language from interaction with his fellow beings in any society that is why interactionists perspective of SLA is important.      
Learners observe others using language and imitates others in the social world and with the collaboration of their language learners they move from one learning step to another.
Vygotsky introduced new concept named by him as ‘scaffolding’ which is assistance and aid one learner gets from another person. This assistance can be given from teachers, relatives, classmates etc which helps them to perform their learning tasks proficiently.

THEORY OF CONNENNECTIONISM IN SLA

            Connectionism rejects the Chomsky’s theory of the innate endowment and describes SLA in terms of information processing and mental representations. Elman et al (1996) accept that there is internalised system of language, but they disagrees that they are directly contained in our genes.
            Any learning is taken as a matter of neural networks. The connection of these networks are strengthened or weakened and are dependent on experience. The processing of experiences and the repetition of it causes the strengthening of these connections.

THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH OF SLA

According to the communicative approach, the primary goal of teaching second language is to enable students to use the target language in their daily communication. Adherents of this approach are of the view that teaching vocabulary and structures are less important. If they will be only taught grammar and its usage there preparation will be inadequate.
In other words it can be said that the rules of grammar should be taught with its practical implication. Students should be taught how rules are used in some particular social context. According to this approach the learners cannot communicate efficiently unless they have command over usage and the use of language. It is only through the context, negotiating for meaning and interaction that students can use second language effectively.

KRASHEN’S FIVE HYPOTHESIS

The most important and well accepted SLA theories are of Krashen. Stephan Krashen most of the study was on bilingual language acquisition. His language theories had a great impact on SLA and teaching field since the 1980s.
Krashen theory consists of five hypotheses which are the Acquisition-Learning hypothesis, the Monitor hypothesis, the Natural Order hypothesis, the Input hypothesis, and the Affective Filter hypothesis.

THE ACQUISITION-LEARNING HYPOTHESIS

The Acquisition learning hypothesis is one of the most important hypotheses which emphasise the distinction between acquisition and learning.

According to him language acquisition is a subconscious process, similar to the child acquisition of his first language. Language acquisition can only takes place in a very non-threatening environment which promotes meaningful interaction and natural communication. While acquiring any language, the focus is not on the form but on the communicative aspect of the language. Acquisition of language is important for both children and adults

On the other hand language learning is a conscious process which occurs in academic settings. Language learning gives the conscious knowledge of grammatical forms and rules of grammar. According to Krashen point of view language acquisition is more important than language learning.

 THE MONITOR HYPOTHESIS

                    The Monitor Hypothesis further shows the relationship between acquisition and learning. Conscious learning is outcome of monitoring and learned grammar .According to Krashen, learning system have a role of ‘Monitor’ which function is to plan, edit,  and correct whereas the acquired system does not work in this way as it is the utterance initiator. Second language learners focus on form and think about correctness of sentence structure. Role of conscious learning should be limited for proficient language learning. Role of monitor should be minor and its purpose should only to correct deviation in normal speech.

                                                    KRASHEN'S MONITOR HYPOTHESIS 

   Krashen also describes that there is individual differences among language learners according to the use of ‘monitor’. There are over-users of monitor who uses monitor excessively, and there are under-users that maybe not learned or those who does not prefer to use monitor. And optimal user is those who use the monitor appropriately. Lack of self-confidence is generally related to the over-use of the 'monitor'.

 THE NATURAL ORDER HYPOTHESIS

The Natural Order Hypothesis in this hypothesis, Krashen claims that we acquire language in a predictable order. Grammatical items are acquired in the natural order, such as some grammatical structures can be acquired earlier in comparison with other structures. This natural order is not dependent on the learner’s background, age or the conditions of exposure. There is some agreement between individual acquirers that reinforced the existence of a Natural Order of language acquisition.

 THE AFFECTIVE FILTER HYPOTHESIS

According to this hypothesis there are some variables which impact the language acquisition process. These variables prevent the input from reaching LAD (Language Acquisition Device). LAD term was used by Chomsky which is the part of the brain that is responsible for language acquisition.
The Affective filter hypothesis embodies that the variables like low motivation, high level of anxiety and low self-esteem can raise the affective filter and forms a “mental block” .This raise of affective filter prevents comprehensible input from being used as acquisition. There are affective variables as well that facilitates the acquisition process. These variables are self-confidence motivation and low level of anxiety .these variables facilitates the process of SLA.

 THE COMPREHENSIBLE INPUT HYPOTHESIS

The Comprehensible Input hypothesis reflects how the language can be acquired proficiently. This theory is not related to the learning of the language but only with acquisition of language.
According to the theory of Krashen, students should be given the input which is only one step beyond their level of competence. For example if the learner is at the stage of “i” then he should be given the input which is “i+1” so that acquisition of the language takes place.



MISTAKES AND CORRECTIONS


Here is the detail description of Mistakes and Correction .
(I also wrote how to give presentation on Mistakes and Correction. If you want to read that presentation go here)

MISTAKES OF MEANING AND MISTAKES OF FORM:

Mistakes are usually considered as part of learning but we also agree that correction is a part of teaching If making mistakes is a part of learning, and correction is a part of teaching, how do the two of them go together? 
Teachers should know that the most important sort of mistakes are only those  that lead to a misunderstanding.

There are two types of mistakes which students usually made:

  •       The mistake that occurs when a speaker uses a correct piece of language (linguistic form) that doesn't mean what the speaker wanted to mean;
  • ·      The mistake which occurs when the speaker uses a correct linguistic form which is socially unacceptable – the big problem here being one of politeness.

As teacher, we should:

  • ·                              Not to rush into correction before we know what someone wants to mean, 
  • ·                                To think about politeness as well as corrections.

We have also seen that meaning and communication are affected by mistakes of language form.
When we talk about mistakes of form, we are comparing something in the student’s English with Standard English. For example, if a student says,

I am come yesterday.
We would probably compare that with the standard form and correct it as
And call it a mistake:
I came yesterday

The causes of mistakes are:

·      1:   One cause of mistake in speaking a foreign language is the influence of the speaker’s first language.
·     2:   A second cause of mistake is when learners think they know a rule, but in fact they don’t know quite enough.
·      3:   Thirdly, people may say things that they know are not correct, because this is still their best chance of getting their message across. This is another intelligent use of knowledge about English in order to communicate in English.
·       4:  Fourthly, mistakes can happen because someone is in a hurry, or tired, or thinking about something else

Kinds of linguistic mistakes:

we can divide linguistic mistakes into:

·          **  Slips:

          which a student can self-correct;

·         **   Errors: 

          which a student can’t self-correct, but where it is clear which form the student wanted to                          use, and where the class is familiar with that form;

·       **Attempts:

           where students have no real idea how to structure what they want to mean, or where meaning and structure intended are not clear to the teacher.

WHAT IS THE IMPORTANCE OF MISTAKES? WHAT IS ACCURACY AND FLUENCY?

THE IMPORTUNE OF MISTAKES:

Mistakes should not be considered as failure but as "learning steps". Mistakes actually show growth in learning.
For Example the following two sentences present a  different picture. As a teacher we should change our perspective about mistakes.Mistakes actually are ‘learning steps’ and they signal the growth of learning.
My students make a lot of mistakes
My students make a lot of “learning steps”.
Mistakes are Learning steps

                WHAT SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION THEORIES SAY ABOUT IMPORTANCE OF MISTAKES:


When 
Krashen theory consists of five hypotheses which are the Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis, The Monitor Hypothesis, The Natural Order Hypothesis, The Input Hypothesis and the Affective Filter Hypothesis.  Let  see what “Acquisition- Learning Hypothesis” and “Monitor Hypothesis " say about mistakes.

ACQUISITION – LEARNING HYPOTHESIS:

 Krashen differentiated between acquisition and learning. According to him acquisition is “unconscious process” while learning is a “conscious effort” .Krashen said that adults can also acquire second language just like children.

What is acquisition
What is learning
Learner makes mistakes.
It is an unconscious process.
This is conscious effort learners are not allowed to make mistakes.
Focus is not on grammatical correction or linguistic form of the language
Students have knowledge of grammatical forms and they are conscious about grammatical mistakes
Focus on  communicative function of language


No correction. Mistakes are appreciated.
Mistakes are considered as failure.

Focus on fluency of language.
Focus on accuracy.


   It is teacher's duty to make their students to acquire language, not learn language. They should not correct their students at every step if they are using ungrammatical forms. Their students should have new experience of language. They should be risk takers. As a teacher their job is not to discourage “learning steps” in students. If they are saying “sister-husband” instead of “brother-in-law” then they should not be discouraged. They will acquire language only if they will make mistakes just like a child makes a mistake while learning mother tongue.

WHAT IS FLUENCY?


  •          More attention on communicative function of language
  •         Less focus on grammatical correction of language


Fluency or Accuracy in students

In the following example the teacher is discouraging fluency in students


KRASHEN MONITOR HYPOTHESIS:

Monitor  hypothesis is related to fluency of language. He said in his hypothesis that whenever an individual say or write anything he/she correct edit or plan it.
            According to him this correction or monitoring should be of appropriate level. If the person correct or monitor himself so much then he cannot speak a language with fluency and it also depicts that a person lacks self confidence. It is job of a teacher to make his students optimal user of monitor.

WHAT IS ACCURACY?

 Accuracy is just the opposite of fluency.

  • ·          Students are corrected whenever they make a mistake.
  • ·         The focus is on linguistic form of language.
She told them that our teachers also demand accuracy in examination. The correction should be positive not criticism or punishment.

ROLE OF A TEACHER

Role of a teacher


CORRECTION AND ACCURACY IN SPOKEN ENGLISH

 Teacher would agree that spoken accuracy is most important for learners when they are practising carefully something that has just has been represented to them,

CORRECTING THE GRAMMAR

Following are some of examples of correcting grammar for example
1: Greenland is the large island in the world.
2: The (hot) place in the world is Dallol in Ethiopia.
3: The (large) ocean is a Pacific.

The first thing to remember is that the best form of correction is SELF-CORRECTION.

SELF-CORRECTION

Learner usually prefers to put their own mistake right rather than be corrected by someone. Self-correction is easier to remember, someone has put something right in his or own head. Particularly it is important to give a chance for self-correction. Mistake is what we have called Slip
Don’t correct the mistake yourself, but show that a mistake has been made.
You can do this by the expression on your face, or by making a sign with your hand, or by saying something such as Errr….,or Mmmm,’ or whatever comes naturally.
Then give the student a little time to recognize the mistake and correct it.

PEER CORRECTION

Peer correction is particularly useful in the case of what we called errors.
There are four types of peer correction
·         Firstly when a learner makes a mistake and another learner corrects it both learners are involved in listening to and thinking about the language
·         Secondly teacher encourages learner to correct their mistakes so that teacher gets a lot of information about the student’s ability
·         Thirdly students become used to the idea that they can learn from the each other
·         Fourthly if students get used to the idea of peer correction without each other’s feelings

                                             Two problems with peer correction

·         Firstly when teacher ask for peer correction from the whole class,it might be that always same two or three people want to reply
·         Secondly if students are not used to correcting each other, they may find it very difficult to change their habit

Teacher Correction

The more the students are involved in correction, the more they have to think about the language used in the classroom. Self correction and peer correction at first, the teacher can sometimes help by focusing attention on the place where the mistake occurs.
                          
Importance of teacher Correction

As teacher says ‘in….vent….,’she holds up three fingers of one hand to show that the word has three syllables in it. she points to the first finger she says, ‘in’ and the second finger as she says, ‘vent’. As she points to the third finger, she pauses and looks questioningly at the class, hoping that someone will add the ‘ed’.

Correction and fluency in spoken English

fluency in English language can be gain :
·         By using English in real situation.
·         By learning new phrases instead of new words. When ever come to meet to new word write it down in form of phrase and use it in daily language.
·         Must do practice of it because Fluency needs practice.

Difference between accuracy and Fluency:


difference in accuracy and fluency
DIFFERENCE IN ACCURACY AND FLUENCY

Some rules to be fluent while using a language:

  • ·         Student needs experience of uninterrupted, meaningful communication.
  • ·         Student needs to feel that people are focusing on what they are saying rather than how they are saying.
  • ·         Students should not focus on accuracy of language but he should focus on fluency.
  • ·         To learn a language efficiently student should not focus on grammatical errors it will make him confuse.
  • ·         Student should keep it in mind that mistakes are the path of learning.
  • ·         Error and mistake gives student opportunity to learn more efficiently.


Different techniques which a teacher can use to teach a language.

Delayed Correction:

When a student commits a mistake and teacher does not interrupt him at the spot and makes him correct at the end of the lecture that is called delayed correction.
When a teacher gives a student an opportunity to learn, to speak and to make mistakes without any fear and hesitation, student will learn more quickly.
But when there is a threat to student to be punished for making mistakes he will not learn. He will avoid speaking. He will never share his thoughts and ideas liberally.


Peer correction.

When a teacher gives an assignment to students and asks them to check each other mistakes in a positive way it is called peer correction.
Peer correction is done by class fellows or our fellow friends. Students check each other. It helps them to learn in a better way. It can be very helpful during pair and group working. We learn from our peers.
As shown in the figure;
Observer:
By using this technique students work in group of four or three. Three of them carry out the activity while fourth one listens and tries to note down some mistakes that the other makes. This student is the observer.

 Observer should do:
·         He should focus on group fellow mistakes.
·         He should Notice the errors and mistakes done by group fellow and note down them on a note book.
·         He should write down something that is incorrect and impolite.
·         He should Show those mistakes at the end.

Observer should not do:
·         He should not interrupt group fellows.
·         He should not try to catch every mistake.
·         He should not correct the other students in the group.
                                               
Advantages:
·                     Students are encouraged to make their own decisions.
·                     It makes them more responsible for their use of language.
·                     Observer reduces the amount of talk that goes on in the students’ own language.

Sensitivity:
We should make an important note there that peer correction needs to be handled sensitively. You do not want to highlight the fact that certain people in the class know less than everyone else. Be subtle when you use this technique.

Normal Conversation:
Student learns a language in a better way when he gets a chance to have a normal conversation.
The idea of correction is impossible in a conversation but there is something that a teacher can
do to help students in learning. Teacher should react normally to what a student say in actual
situation. Teacher should not correct them at the spot. He should avoid correcting some common
 mistakes that are not so important.